PORTLAND, Oregon, April 7, 2008 (ENS) – Columbia River Basin tribes and federal agencies today announced the start of a public comment period for an unprecedented $900 million, 10 year set of proposed agreements and actions to improve habitat and strengthen endangered salmon stocks in the Columbia River Basin.

Critics say the deal does not go far enough because it does nothing to remove four federal dams on the Lower Snake River that block the salmon’s passage to and from the sea.

The agreement is intended to end decades of litigation and would specifically resolve Endangered Species Act litigation over the Bush administration’s salmon plan now pending before Judge James Redden of the U.S. District Court of Oregon.

Judge Redden has repeatedly ruled that the Bush administration’s salmon plan violates the Endangered Species Act.

In 2003, Redden rejected the Clinton administration’s plan, which outlined 199 specific measures to be implemented over 10 years to protect salmon and steelhead from the adverse impacts of the federal dam system.

Salmon migrating upstream to
spawn (Photo courtesy U.S. EPA)

Now, as the result of two years of extensive negotiations, four tribal groups and three federal agencies have produced the agreements that are presented for public comment.

The proposed Memoranda of Agreements are with the federal agencies that operate and maintain the Federal Columbia River Power System as well as for selling the power from these facilities: the Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation.

These agencies have agreements with four tribal groups and with the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.

The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation commit themselves to “accomplishing biological objectives with the funds, linked to meeting the agencies’ statutory requirements,” all parties said in a joint statement today.

“Working for the salmon is sacred work,” said Fidelia Andy, chair of the Fish and Wildlife Committee of the Yakama Nation Tribal Council and chairwoman of the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.

Under the agreements, the federal agencies would make available $900 million over 10 years to continue existing programs and to implement new priority fish projects with the tribes.

“First and foremost, the Columbia River Basin agreements deliver certain and stable resources to do this work for salmon, steelhead and other species throughout the Columbia River Basin,” said Andy. “The agreements will get our governments out of the courtroom and back on the firm ground of mutual goals and collaboration.”

Ice Harbor Dam on the Lower Snake
River features two fish ladders but
they cannot replace a free-flowing
river. Generating capacity – 603
megawatts of power.
(Photo courtesy USACE)

Most of funds would be provided by Bonneville Power Administration, BPA, a federal power broker that markets wholesale electrical power from 31 federal hydro projects in the Columbia River Basin, one nonfederal nuclear plant and several other small nonfederal power plants. About 35 percent of the electric power used in the Northwest comes from BPA.

BPA also owns and operates three-fourths of the high-voltage transmission in its service territory – Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and parts of Montana, California, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming.

The Columbia River Basin agreements presented for public comment build on “biological opinions” for salmon and steelhead populations on the federal Endangered Species List and includes the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s fish and wildlife program, the parties said.

The agreements provide common goals and priorities for hydro system mitigation; additional hydro, habitat and hatchery actions; greater clarity about biological benefits and secure funding for 10 years.

Critics such as the nonprofit law firm Earthjustice says, the agreements are of little benefit to the salmon because the four dams that block their access from stream to ocean and back again are still there.

“This new deal would roll back recent victories improving dam operations for salmon,” said Earthjustice attorney Todd True. “The opportunity to restore these fish is rapidly slipping away. BPA and the other federal agencies under this administration have consistently been more interested in protecting the status quo than in restoring wild salmon. Today’s deal is a good example of that failed approach.”

“This deal defies decades of salmon science that say salmon recovery in the Columbia and Snake River Basin is not possible with habitat and hatchery programs alone,” said Bill Shake, former assistant regional director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Instead, he says, any scientifically sound plan must include increased spill and flow for juvenile salmon survival and removal of four outdated dams on the Lower Snake River.

The tribes and many others have said this in comments filed in January with the federal government opposing the plan that is the basis for today’s deal.

Annual gathering organized by the River Network 2007. (Photo courtesy Save Our Wild Salmon)

Dam removal proponents point out that the four dams create still water and impair the natural river flows young salmon need to migrate to sea. The dams hinder the migration of adult salmon trying to return to spawn in cold, high elevation tributaries, raising the risk that climate change will prevent these salmon from ever reaching the cold water they need to survive.

To agree to these proposals the tribes must “disavow their prior biological recommendations, which are steeply at odds with the federal approach. The tribes also must refrain from advocating for measures they have long said were scientifically necessary for salmon survival such as removing the four dams, Earthjustice says.

But Chairman Ron Suppah, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, is pleased with the agreement, saying, “We came to the table with the federal agencies as courtroom adversaries. We leave that table now as partners.”

“We have built an aggressive plan that fixes problems wherever the fish encounter them,” Suppah said. “Our plan gets the focus and energy where it must be now – on recovering fish, providing opportunity for our tribal fishers and on finding real solutions rather than blame.”

Chairman Mike Marchand, Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, said, “These agreements reflect our strongly held belief that it takes partnerships and hard work among many stakeholders using an array of strategies if we are to succeed with fish recovery.”

“Each one of us brings something special and unique to this agreement,” said Chairman Antone Minthorn, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation. “It’s this diversity of resources and knowledge that will be instrumental to our success.”

Chairman Ralph Sampson, Jr., Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation is pleased to be out of the courtroom, although the judge repeatedly has upheld the tribe’s position.

“Yakama truly believes that such a cooperative effort will provide benefits far beyond those available through the continuation of litigation,” he said, “in which the Yakama Nation has been highly successful, but which has resulted in few if any true benefits to the resource.”

In the struggle between salmon and dams, some dams are just too large to remove, such as the giant Grand Coulee Dam on the upper Columbia River, largest in the United States.

Runs of sockeye salmon once as large as three million fish spawned in nursery lakes in the uppermost reaches of the Columbia and Snake River basins. But upstream passage was blocked by the construction of several key dams including the Grand Coulee Dam, completed in 1941, and now the sockeye are down to a remnant population in one or two lakes.

The announcement today begins a BPA-led public process that seeks input on the proposal to enter into these agreements as negotiated and potential environmental effects of these proposed agreements. The comment period will close April 23, 2008.

A decision on whether to proceed with the agreements will follow the public comment period. For more information on the public process, please visit www.bpa.gov/comment.

View This Story On Eco–mmunity Map.

PORTLAND, Oregon, January 29, 2008 (ENS) – California Central Valley fall Chinook salmon stocks appear to be undergoing a “significant decline,” said Pacific Fishery Management Council Director Donald McIsaac today.

Dr. McIsaac warned that if the low abundance is confirmed, all marine and freshwater fisheries that target these salmon stocks could be affected.

“The low returns are particularly distressing since this stock has consistently been the healthy work horse for salmon fisheries off California and most of Oregon,” he said.

The Pacific Council is a federal advisory panel responsible for managing fisheries off the coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington.

Chinook salmon in a freshwater
stream (Photo courtesy NOAA)

Chinook salmon are also called king, spring, or tyee salmon, and are the largest of the Pacific salmon. Chinook salmon are highly prized by commercial, sport, and subsistence fishers. Like all Pacific salmon, chinook are anadromous, which means they hatch in freshwater streams and rivers, migrate to the ocean for feeding and growth, and return to their natal waters to spawn.

California Central Valley fall run Chinook salmon spawn in the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins and their tributaries.

California Central Valley fall Chinook salmon are not on the federal endangered species list, but they were classified as a Species of Concern on April 15, 2004.

Last week, the Council’s Salmon Technical Team met to tabulate salmon returns and catches. Two areas of bad news emerged.

First, in 2007 the adult spawning escapement for Sacramento River fall Chinook salmon failed to meet the escapement goal of 122,000 to 180,000 adults for the first time in 15 years.

Sacramento River fall Chinook is the largest component of Central Valley Chinook.

The escapement goal, or conservation objective, is the optimal number of adult fish returning to spawn in order to maximize the production of the stock.

Second, the count of “jacks” in the Central Valley fall Chinook return this past fall was at a record low. Only 2,000 jacks returned, compared to a long-term average of about 40,000 and the previous record low of 10,000.

Jacks are immature fish that return to the rivers at age two, unlike adult fish, which return at age three or four. Their numbers are used to forecast future returns. This suggests that 2008 abundance will probably also be weak.

Last week, scientists questioned whether returns in 2008 could meet the conservation objective even without any commercial or recreational salmon fishing.

If returns do not meet the conservation objective, an emergency rule from National Marine Fisheries Service may be required to allow any fisheries at all, Dr. McIsaac said.

The reason for the decline is unclear, he said. Both hatchery and naturally produced fish have been negatively affected, and returns of coastal stocks in Oregon, in the Columbia River, and in British Columbia were all low in 2007.

“The decline seems to be a coastwide phenomenon, probably related to ocean conditions,” he said.

The implications of a precipitous decline could be substantial for both commercial and recreational fisheries coastwide. In 2006, a similar decline in Klamath stocks led to major cutbacks in salmon fishing opportunities.

Sacramento River salmon have a greater range than Klamath River stocks, and are caught in California, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. They are considered the “driver” of commercial fisheries in Oregon and California, explained Dr. McIsaac.

The Council will consider these numbers and set harvest levels this spring. In three to four weeks, the Council will release estimates of salmon abundance for 2008.

Then, at its March 8-14 meeting in Sacramento, California, the Council will develop a range of management options. Salmon management discussions begin on Tuesday, March 11, when the Council will review 2007 salmon fisheries, discuss stock abundance estimates, and tentatively adopt salmon management measures for analysis by Council technical teams and scientists.

Friday, the Council is scheduled to adopt management options for public review. These options will probably range from status quo harvest levels to significant closures.

Public hearings to receive input on the options are scheduled for March 31 in Westport, Washington and Coos Bay, Oregon, and for April 1 in Eureka, California. The Council will consult with scientists, hear public comment, and revise preliminary decisions until it chooses a final option at its meeting during the week of April 7 in Seattle.

All Council meetings are open to the public. Based on previous experience with Klamath fisheries, the Council expects there to be a large public turnout at both the March and April meetings and the public hearings.

The Pacific Fishery Management Council is one of eight regional fishery management councils established by the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 for the purpose of managing fisheries three to 200 miles offshore of the U.S. coastline.

View This Story On Eco-mmunity Map.