<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sundance Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/tag/interest-law-firm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered</link>
	<description>Fresh culture daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:20:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Groups Sue for Clean Water Law Enforcement in Northern California</title>
		<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2009/02/groups-sue-for-clean-water-law-enforcement-in-northern-california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2009/02/groups-sue-for-clean-water-law-enforcement-in-northern-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sundance Channel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abundant populations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommunity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north coast rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern california steelhead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northwest regional director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pacific coast federation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rivers and streams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salmon species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water diversions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web1.sundancechannel.com/blogs/ecommunity_news/390443069/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO, California, February 5, 2009 (ENS) &#8211; Conservation and fishermen&#8217;s groups filed a lawsuit Wednesday in California Superior Court seeking to force state and regional water boards to implement existing clean water laws in the wild rivers and streams of the state&#8217;s North Coast region. The groups argue that only cleaner waters will enable [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2009/02/groups-sue-for-clean-water-law-enforcement-in-northern-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush Officials Sued for Steering $350M to Forest Foundations</title>
		<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/09/bush-officials-sued-for-steering-350m-to-forest-foundations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/09/bush-officials-sued-for-steering-350m-to-forest-foundations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sundance Channel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureau of customs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureau of customs and border protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[center for biological diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customs and border protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommunity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal appropriations law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest stewardship council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international programs director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public treasury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web1.sundancechannel.com/blogs/ecommunity_news/390370117/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEATTLE, Washington, September 11, 2008 (ENS) &#8211; A coalition of conservation organizations filed a lawsuit Wednesday against the Bush administration alleging that federal officials diverted $350 million from the public treasury to forestry foundations &#8220;dominated by the timber industry.&#8221; The suit alleges that the administration violated federal appropriations law when, in September 2006, without any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/09/bush-officials-sued-for-steering-350m-to-forest-foundations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enviro-Labor Coalitions Challenge Two Toxic Pesticides</title>
		<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/08/enviro-labor-coalitions-challenge-two-toxic-pesticides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/08/enviro-labor-coalitions-challenge-two-toxic-pesticides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sundance Channel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alaska community action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alaska community action on toxics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommunity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm labor organizing committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northwest treeplanters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organochlorine chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticide action network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticide manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united farm workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web1.sundancechannel.com/blogs/ecommunity_news/390364719/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO, California, July 31, 2008 (ENS) &#8211; This has been the week for going after pesticides in court. Since Thursday, July 24, two coalitions &#8211; with many of the same member groups &#8211; have filed two federal lawsuits challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for allowing the continued use of organochlorine pesticides. These two [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/08/enviro-labor-coalitions-challenge-two-toxic-pesticides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Lawsuit Filed to Halt Florida&#8217;s Toxic Algae Blooms</title>
		<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/07/federal-lawsuit-filed-to-halt-floridas-toxic-algae-blooms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/07/federal-lawsuit-filed-to-halt-floridas-toxic-algae-blooms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sundance Channel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algae blooms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue green algae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caloosahatchee river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean water act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservancy of southwest florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommunity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida wildlife federation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmful blooms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic blue green algae]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web1.sundancechannel.com/blogs/ecommunity_news/390362829/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TALLAHASSEE, Florida, July 18, 2008 (ENS) &#8211; Today, five environmental groups filed a lawsuit to compel the federal government and the state of Florida to set numeric limits on the excess nutrients which trigger harmful blooms of blue-green algae. Algae blooms are fouling Florida&#8217;s beaches, lakes, rivers, and springs, threatening public health, and closing swimming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/07/federal-lawsuit-filed-to-halt-floridas-toxic-algae-blooms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgia Judge Yanks Coal Power Permit on Climate Concerns</title>
		<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/07/georgia-judge-yanks-coal-power-permit-on-climate-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/07/georgia-judge-yanks-coal-power-permit-on-climate-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sundance Channel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chattahoochee river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean air act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal fired power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal fired power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommunity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental protection division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fulton county superior court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superior court judge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web1.sundancechannel.com/blogs/ecommunity_news/390359944/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ATLANTA, Georgia, June 30, 2008 (ENS) &#8211; A Fulton County Superior Court judge today issued a decision that blocks construction of the first coal-burning power plant proposed in Georgia in more than 20 years. The judge ruled that the new plant must limit its emissions of the heat-trapping gas carbon dioxide. This is the first [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/07/georgia-judge-yanks-coal-power-permit-on-climate-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmental Groups Petition to Overturn EPA Ozone Standard</title>
		<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/05/environmental-groups-petition-to-overturn-epa-ozone-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/05/environmental-groups-petition-to-overturn-epa-ozone-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sundance Channel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american lung association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appalachian mountain club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommunity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental defense fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal environment agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground level ozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house committee on oversight and government reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national parks conservation association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ozone pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web1.sundancechannel.com/blogs/ecommunity_news/390342264/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, DC, May 28, 2008 (ENS) &#8211; Health and environmental advocates filed a lawsuit Tuesday challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency&#8217;s refusal to adopt stronger standards for ground-level ozone proposed by the agency&#8217;s own scientists. The American Lung Association, Natural Resources Defense Council, Environmental Defense Fund, the National Parks Conservation Association, and the Appalachian Mountain [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/05/environmental-groups-petition-to-overturn-epa-ozone-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groups Contest Pollution Reporting Exemption for Factory Farms</title>
		<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/04/groups-contest-pollution-reporting-exemption-for-factory-farms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/04/groups-contest-pollution-reporting-exemption-for-factory-farms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sundance Channel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommunity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazardous emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazardous gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazardous substance releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hog confinements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen sulfide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington dc march]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web1.sundancechannel.com/blogs/ecommunity_news/390332682/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, DC, March 28, 2008 (ENS) &#8211; More than 70 groups from 27 states are objecting to a proposal by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that would exempt factory farms from reporting emissions of hazardous gases from animal waste. The public interest law firm Earthjustice submitted formal comments on behalf of the groups, which include [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/04/groups-contest-pollution-reporting-exemption-for-factory-farms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Absent Analysis, Forest Planning Rule Assumes No Impact</title>
		<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/02/absent-analysis-forest-planning-rule-assumes-no-impact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/02/absent-analysis-forest-planning-rule-assumes-no-impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sundance Channel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david dillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommunity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land management plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national forest lands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national forest system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural resource conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unhealthy trees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web1.sundancechannel.com/blogs/ecommunity_news/390323787/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, DC, February 7, 2008 (ENS) &#8211; Environmental attorney Trent Orr of the nonprofit public interest law firm Earthjustice warns that the Bush administration is again attempting to remove key protections for U.S. national forests. This attempt was evident, he says, today, when the U.S. Forest Service released its court-ordered Final Environmental Impact Statement for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/02/absent-analysis-forest-planning-rule-assumes-no-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home Furnace Efficiency Standards Challenged as Weak</title>
		<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/01/home-furnace-efficiency-standards-challenged-as-weak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/01/home-furnace-efficiency-standards-challenged-as-weak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sundance Channel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney general richard blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connecticut attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connecticut attorney general richard blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommunity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency and renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential furnaces]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web1.sundancechannel.com/blogs/ecommunity_news/390320361/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK, New York, January 20, 2008 (ENS) &#8211; Environmental advocates and state and city governments filed lawsuits Thursday to force the U.S. Department of Energy to adopt stronger energy efficiency standards for residential furnaces and boilers. The public interest law firm Earthjustice filed suit on behalf of Natural Resources Defense Council, NRDC, arguing that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/01/home-furnace-efficiency-standards-challenged-as-weak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Brownfields Practices Challenged in New York</title>
		<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/01/state-brownfields-practices-challenged-in-new-york/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/01/state-brownfields-practices-challenged-in-new-york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sundance Channel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brownfield cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommunity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governor eliot spitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governor george pataki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york dec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest research group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web1.sundancechannel.com/blogs/ecommunity_news/390316170/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ALBANY, New York, December 31, 2007 (ENS) &#8211; Four environmental groups seeking stronger cleanup standards for brownfield properties are suing the state of New York. Their lawsuit challenges the state&#8217;s Brownfield Cleanup Program that is intended to encourage the cleanup and redevelopment of the thousands of boarded-up gas stations, decaying factories and other abandoned brownfield [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2008/01/state-brownfields-practices-challenged-in-new-york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

