Blog home >

SACRAMENTO, California, September 30, 2008 (ENS) – California will reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in consumer products and the environment under legislation signed Monday in Los Angeles by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

The two bills enable the state to take more responsibility by 2011 for identifying and regulating dangerous chemicals and for analyzing safer alternatives.

Governor Schwarzenegger said the legislation “will spur a new era of research and innovation and promises to drive economic growth and competition in the green chemistry sector.”

“This bi-partisan package of environmental legislation propels California to the forefront of the nation and the world with the most comprehensive green chemistry program ever established,” the governor said.

“It also puts an end to the less effective ‘chemical-by-chemical’ bans of the past,” he said. “With these two bills, we will stop looking at toxics as an inevitable byproduct of industrial production. Instead they will be something that can be removed from every product in the design stage – protecting people’s health and our environment.”

The legislation is a response to growing concerns raised by scientists and public health advocates about unsafe and untested chemicals in consumer products.

While many consumer products include harmful substances, from lead-tainted toys to linens with toxic flame retardants, there is currently no state agency that has broad-based authority to take these products off the shelves or spur the development of safer alternatives.

The governor signed AB 1879 by Assemblymember Mike Feuer, a Los Angeles Democrat, and SB 509 by Senator Joe Simitian, a Palo Alto Democrat. Each legislator also co-authored the other’s companion measure, and they both worked with Republican lawmakers to craft the bills.


From left: Assemblymember Mike Feuer,
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, and
Senator Joe Simitian at the bill signing
news conference. September 29, 2008
(Photo courtesy Office of the Governor)

Assemblymember Feuer said, “Instead of putting partisan politics first, we’re putting peoples’ health first.”

AB 1879 establishes authority for the state Department of Toxic Substances Control to develop regulations that create a process for identifying and prioritizing chemicals of concern and to create methods for analyzing alternatives. It allows DTSC to impose “restrictions or bans” on chemicals of concern.

The bill establishes a Green Ribbon Science Panel made up of experts to provide advice on scientific matters, chemical policy recommendations and implementation strategies, and to ensure implementation efforts are based on science.

It expands the role of the Environmental Policy Council, made up of the heads of all California Environmental Protection Agency boards and departments, to oversee implementation of the green chemistry program.

SB 509 creates an online Toxics Information Clearinghouse, a database to increase consumer knowledge about the toxicity and hazards of thousands of chemicals used in California every day.

“Californians currently have little if any access to information about the many thousands of chemicals that are commonly used in their products, released into the environment, or present at their workplaces,” said Senator Simitian. “The governor’s signature on SB 509 represents a significant breakthrough in the ultimate goal of protecting people from exposure to harmful products.”

Simitian chairs the Senate Environmental Quality Committee which held hearings in 2006 to discuss the findings of a report by the University of California’s California Policy Research Center entitled “Green Chemistry in California: A Framework for Leadership in Chemicals Policy and Innovation.” The report revealed that on any given day, the United States produces or imports 42 billon pounds of chemicals that may cause problems for human health and the environment.


The federal Consumer Product Safety Commission
recalled this toy boat today for
excessively high levels of lead.
(Photo courtesy CPSC)

The Chemical Industry Council of California is supportive of the new legislation, endorsing the comments of attorneys Todd Maiden and Eric McLaughlin of the council’s affiliate member, the law firm of ReedSmith.

“The most prominent features of California’s green chemistry law are its foundation on science and real-life assessment of chemical usage and exposure risk,” write Maiden and McLaughlin.

“Like all new regulations, those promulgated under the Green Chemistry law will impose operational changes and up-front compliance costs on the regulated community. However, change also presents new opportunity,” they write. “Compliance with California’s green chemistry law will likely reduce the costs of proper hazardous waste management and disposal, and satisfaction of workplace safety and health requirements. New opportunities to market products and processes as eco-friendly will also arise.”

Sierra Club California Director Bill Magavern helped to shape the legislation and he was present at the signing ceremony. He asserted Sierra Club’s position that, “Californians should be able to buy products for our households without having to worry that we’re bringing home hazardous substances that could harm our families.”

“We worked hard all year long with Mr. Feuer and our allies at Breast Cancer Fund, California League of Conservation Voters and Environment California to craft this landmark legislation,” Magavern said.

“These legislative measures are the beginning of a much-needed overhaul of the state’s broken chemicals management system,” said Jeanne Rizzo, R.N., president of the Breast Cancer Fund. “With the signing of these bills, our state is taking a historic step toward reducing Californians’ exposure to toxic chemicals.”

Advocates say they are committed to working with the governor over the coming months to implement the legislation. But they also urge the Schwarzenegger to release his Green Chemistry Initiative recommendations, which are expected to include a more comprehensive plan for chemical policy reform and the search for safer, less toxic chemicals.

View This Story On Eco–mmunity Map.



In order to lighten your load of holiday shopping, we organized some green [www.sundancechannel.com] gift-giving ideas.

Designer Spotlights

For the Kids:
Q Collection Junior [www.sundancechannel.com]

Q Collection Junior provides a cute line of children’s furniture, bedding and accessories, while using sustainable [www.sundancechannel.com] materials and manufacturing. All of Q Collection Junior’s cotton is 100% organic [www.sundancechannel.com]. They don’t use formaldehyde, polyurethane, toxic [www.sundancechannel.com] flame retardants or heavy metals in their products.

Home Furnishing:
Ohio Design [www.sundancechannel.com]

Ohio Design uses graphic overlays to enhance the look of their furniture, while producing the pieces using reclaimed wood, recyclable steel and non-toxic [www.sundancechannel.com] finishes.

Accessories:
ply Design [www.sundancechannel.com]

Ply Design demonstrates that even the smallest scrap can be reused. They offer products with recycled felt and/or recycled leather.

Online Gifts

For your Pet:
Worldwise [worldwise.stores.yahoo.net]
Worldwise is a leader in green [www.sundancechannel.com] toy making for pets. All of their products are made of natural [www.sundancechannel.com], recycled, reclaimed or certified organic [www.sundancechannel.com] materials.

An Assortment of Gifts:
EcoExpress [www.ecoexpress.com]

EcoExpress provides natural [www.sundancechannel.com] and organic [www.sundancechannel.com] gifts for any special occasion. Making it easy to support the environment [www.sundancechannel.com], you can buy great gifts from their wide assortment of “earth friendly gourmet, spa and rainforest baskets”.

Something Pretty:
Organic Bouquet [www.organicbouquet.com]

These beautiful arrangements are a great gift for the holidays, and they send the right message. Organic Bouquet’s lovely flower arrangements are all organic [www.sundancechannel.com], promoting a healthy environment [www.sundancechannel.com].

Do-It-Yourself Holiday Ideas
Holiday Recipe:
Glogg Recipe [www.organicvalley.coop]
Going to a holiday party? Don’t bring the regular egg nog. Spice things up a bit and impress your friends with your own homemade Swedish glogg.

Homemade Gifts:
Garden and Hearth: Homemade Gifts from the Heart [www.gardenandhearth.com]
Don’t know what to buy someone this holiday? Try making a gift from items you already have. It’s personal, creative and ecological [www.sundancechannel.com]
. Garden and Hearth has great homemade gift projects for you to get your hands on.



Up to 80% of the e-waste in the US is exported to impoverished companies, according to the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition [svtc.etoxics.org] (SVTC), and this is a bad thing. Toxic components are either openly burned, soaked in acid baths and dumped into rivers, or piled into mountains of e-waste for scrap recovery, where workers, including children, smash leaded glass tubes, breathe lead solder fumes, and melt plastics with toxic flame retardants. The SVTC points to this video [svtc.etoxics.org], produced by Good magazine with help from the Basel Action Network [www.ban.org], for the harsh reality in moving pictures: it isn’t pretty. Though it’s been illegal to export e-waste to foreign countries since 1990, it still happens, but it doesn’t have to. Keep reading for a few ideas on keeping the e-waste from going too far and making a mess.

Perhaps the easiest thing to do is send stuff back to where you got it from: computer retailers. Though they’ve been a bit sketchy in the past, they’re quickly learning that responsible recycling is a must, and that transparency is the key to solid business. Dell [www.dell.com] offers both donation and recycling options, and will take any old computer, regardless if it’s a Dell or not. They’re working from the EU’s WEEE Directive and is “engaged in the development of country-specific implementation schemes to comply with the national WEEE laws” — in short, they’re still working it out, but are headed in the right direction. Hewlett-Packard [www.hp.com] also offers a variety of services that includes any brand of computer (in most countries), HP printer cartridges, rechargeable batteries and cell phones, and they also have some non-recycling alternatives [www.hp.com]. Apple [www.apple.com], which recently updated its environmental policies [www.apple.com], offers free recycling [www.apple.com] with a purchase (and a 10% discount when trading in an old iPod for a new one) as well as a trade-in program for educational and business customers in the US.

If that won’t work for you, check out the list of qualified recyclers that’s part of the Computer Take Back Campaign [www.computertakeback.com], which have qualified recyclers in most of the 50 states. The US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) eCycling [www.epa.gov] program has lots of stats, info and resources to learn more about how to best deal with e-waste, including little nuggets like “computer monitors and older TV picture tubes contain an average of four pounds of lead” — yikes! Check out their sections on basic information [www.epa.gov] and frequent questions [www.epa.gov], and, to get really geeky, have a look at the regulations and standards [www.epa.gov] for disposing of the stuff. To find a reputable private recycler, pick from a list of organizations who have taken the Electronics Recycler’s Pledge of True Stewardship [www.ban.org] [PDF] from the Basel Action Network [www.ban.org]. If your machine still functions (and not just as a paperweight), then seeing that it is reused is perhaps the best option. Companies like RetroBox [www.retrobox.com] and FreeGeek [www.freegeek.org] build computers out of salvaged parts; the latter has a list of like-minded organizations [www.freegeek.org] that can be a good starting place for recycling or reusing your machine. eBay’s Rethink Initiative [rethink.ebay.com] “brings together industry, government and environmental organizations to offer a fresh perspective and new answers to the challenge of e-waste”, and even can help you earn some cash for finding your old electronics a new home. With all of these options, there’s no reason your old electronics should end up as e-waste; stay tuned tomorrow for ideas to avoid ever having to deal with the stuff again.



Advertisement


Electronic waste, known as e-waste, or even as “Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment” (”WEEE”) to some, is a big, big problem. Generally consisting of any broken or unwanted electrical or electronic appliance — computers and peripherals, TVs, cell phones and the like are the most widely known — it is worrisome because many components of such equipment are toxic to the planet and any humans that come in contact with it. Before we can solve the problem, though, we have to define it.

WEEE: Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment; is also a set of directives on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. See also WEEE Man [www.weeeman.org] (pictured above).

RoHS: Restriction of Hazardous Substances; which restricts the use of six hazardous materials — lead, cadmium, mercury, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDEs) — in the manufacture of various types of electronic and electrical equipment and together with WEEE, sets collection, recycling and recovery targets for all types of electrical goods. Both RoHS and WEEE are only enforced in the EU.

PBBs: polybrominated biphenels and PBDEs: polybrominated diphenyl ether: flame retardants used in some plastics found in common electronics.
EWRA: Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003; law passed by California that prohibits the sale of electronic devices after January 1, 2007, that are prohibited from being sold under the EU RoHS directive, but across a much narrower scope that includes LCDs, CRTs, and the like and only covers the four heavy metals restricted by RoHS. EWRA also has a restricted material disclosure requirement. Other US states and cities are debating whether to adopt similar laws, and there are several states that have mercury and PBDE bans already. Unfortunately, federal RoHS-like regulation in the US is unlikely in the near to medium term.

Given this collection of acronyms, what does it really mean? While there is no generally accepted definition of electronic waste, in most cases electronic waste consists of electronic products that were used for data processing, telecommunications, or entertainment in individual homes and businesses that are now considered obsolete, broken, or irreparable. Despite its common classification as a waste, disposed electronics have considerable potential as a resource, due to their suitability for direct, immediate reuse — for example, many fully functional computers and components are discarded during upgrades — or refurbishing and material recycling of its raw materials. As such, reconceptualization of electronic waste as a resource thus has potential to preempt its potentially hazardous qualities, when done responsibly and correctly. Stay tuned for the rest of the week learn more about how proper e-waste recycling makes a difference.