AUSTIN, Texas, January 2, 2008 (ENS) – Texas could reduce electric usage by 23 percent if utilities invest more in efficiency measures, saving Texans as much $11.9 billion on their electric bills, according to a report written by an energy consulting firm for the state Public Utilities Commission.

The findings released in December support the call by a coalition of local elected officials, business leaders, community groups and faith leaders for the Legislature to increase the mandate on utilities for energy efficiency investments when it convenes for the new session on January 13.

“This report is technical proof of what is already common sense. Using our electricity more efficiently will save Texans money and avoid the need for new dirty power plants,” said Luke Metzger, director of Environment Texas, an environmental advocacy group.

In 1999, Texas became the first state in the nation to pass an energy efficiency resource standard. But, according to the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, today Texas ranks 25th in the nation for utility spending on efficiency.

Now more is being demanded of Texas utilities.

In 2007, lawmakers increased the amount of new electricity demand utilities had to meet through efficiency to 15 percent in 2008 and 20 percent in 2009.

They asked the PUC to study whether those goals could be raised to 30 percent by 2010 and 50 percent by 2015 and still be met cost-effectively.

The report, written by California energy consulting firm Itron with funding from the Public Utilities Commission, concludes that the goals proposed by the legislature for 2015 can be achieved by the majority of investor-owned electric utilities.

TXU’s Montecello power plant burns lignite and
sub-bituminous coal. (Photo credit unknown)

Some utilities will face substantially more difficulty than others in meeting the legislature’s preliminary energy savings goals because the goals are based on a percentage of incremental load growth rather on standards such as total system demand or electricity consumption,” the report states.

The study recommends the 30 percent milestone be delayed by two years, from 2010 to 2012, to give smaller utilities more time to “ramp up” their programs.

In December, a group of more than 100 well known Texans, including El Paso Mayor John Cook and former Shell Oil company president John Hofmeister, sent to the Legislature a letter asking the lawmakers to require utilities to eliminate the growth in demand for electricity by the year 2020 through investments in energy efficiency.

The new report finds that such a requirement is economically feasible and would save the state $2 on electricity costs for every dollar invested.

Texas environmental groups are pleased with the report’s findings.

“The PUC report gives the Legislature the recommendation to move beyond today’s narrow growth in demand goal toward actually cutting energy use and peak demand through our electric utilities,” said Cyrus Reed, conservation director of the Lone Star Chapter of the Sierra Club.

Reed suggests that the Legislature could reduce energy use, cut pollution and create jobs even more by improving building codes for new construction. He would like to see the energy efficiency programs adopted by fast-growing electric cooperative and city-owned utilities.

Low-income weatherization could be funded through the Systems Benefit Fund, Reed suggests, and the Texas LoanSTAR program for energy efficiency upgrades in public buildings could be expanded.

“The Legislature can put Texans back to work weatherizing homes, engineering high efficiency lighting systems, and putting solar panels on every rooftop in Texas,” Metzger said.

The report found that Texas utilities could reduce demand for electricity by offering expanded programs to promote home energy audits and weatherization programs, switching out incandescent lighting for energy efficient compact fluorescents, providing rebates to consumers to replace old appliances with new energy efficient appliances, and providing incentives for manufacturers to replace inefficient equipment with more efficient technologies.

“This study shows how we can save money while reducing pollution and creating jobs,” said Tom “Smitty” Smith, director of Public Citizen’s Texas office.

Smith believes that the report underestimates the state’s true potential for efficiency measures.

“We could save more than 1/5 of the energy we use just through retrofits alone,” he said. “It does not include the savings from building integrated solar, better building efficiency standards, use of high tech meters to reduce peak demand, nor the use of combined heating and power equipment to recycle energy all of which could reduce significant amounts of energy.”

View This Story On Eco–mmunity Map.

UPPSALA, Sweden, November 30, 2008 (ENS) – Faith leaders concluded their two-day Interfaith Summit on Climate Change in Uppsala on Saturday by signing a manifesto demanding quick and extensive reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in the wealthy parts of the world.

Christian, Buddhist, Daoist, Sikh, Muslim, Jewish and Native American leaders signed the declaration that states, “We all share the responsibility of being conscious caretakers of our home, planet Earth. We have reflected on the concerns of scientists and political leaders regarding the alarming climate crisis. We share their concerns.”

“The situation is critical,” the manifesto states. “Glaciers and the permafrost are melting. Devastating drought and flooding strike people and ecosystems, especially in the South. Can planet Earth be healed? We are convinced that the answer is yes.”

Church of Sweden Archbishop Anders Wejryd
addresses the Interfaith Summit on Climate
Change. (Photo by Magnus Aronson
courtesy Interfaith Summit)

Hosted by the Church of Sweden, the interfaith leaders were welcomed with an opening address by Swedish Archbishop Anders Wejryd, who said, “We are not at this meeting to find special religious answers to the environmental crisis. We have to share the realities of technology, economy and politics with all people.

“We have gathered to deliberate on what we do with these facts as people of different religious traditions,” said the archbishop. “As people of faith we are carriers of hope – or at least we should be. It is obvious that the world needs change before it is too late and we have a role to play in enabling a changed world-view and changed perspectives for people of the world and for ourselves.”

The faith leaders held their summit and issued their manifesto on the eve of the United Nations’ annual climate conference, held this year in Poznan, Poland from December 1 through 12. The Poznan meeting, which is expected to draw around 8,000 participants, is focused on advancing international cooperation on a future climate change agreement to govern the emission of climate-warming greenhouse gases after the Kyoto Protocol expires in 2012.

The future agreement is set to be finalized at the 2009 UN climate conference in Copenhagen, Denmark next December in time for countries to sign and ratify the document before 2012.

“As people from world religions, we urge governments and international organizations to prepare and agree upon a comprehensive climate strategy for the Copenhagen Agreement,” the Uppsala Manifesto states. “This strategy must be ambitious enough to keep climate change below 2° Celsius (about 3.5 degrees Fahrenheit), and to distribute the burden in an equitable way in accordance with the principles of common but differentiated responsibility and respective capabilities.”

Limiting warming to 2° Celsius above pre-industrial temperatures is essential to averting the worst effects of climate change, scientists say. Yet many environmentalists believe allowing the temperature to rise even that much would be disastrous. The global conservation organization WWF warns that a 2° Celsius temperature rise would bring droughts that will leave many people without safe, clean water, and destroy crops, causing widespread famine. Melting ice caps and glaciers would raise sea levels, leaving some Pacific island nations uninhabitable.

But the Uppsala Manifesto is entitled “Hope for the Future,” and European Vice President Margot Wallstrom also took a hopeful view of the situation in her address to the Interfaith Summit on Friday.

“Combating climate change certainly makes sense. It makes sense because it is not only a challenge, but an opportunity. An opportunity to change the world and steer it towards sustainable development and prosperity for all,” said Wallstrom.

By the year 2020, the European Union as a whole should cut its emissions by at least 20 percent compared to 1990 levels – and we will increase that figure to 30 percent if other developed countries make a similar commitment under a new international agreement, Wallstrom reminded the interfaith participants. The EU agreed to these targets in 2007 along with increased renewable energy sources and energy efficiency.

Interfaith leaders bless the Uppsala Manifesto
(Photo by Magnus Aronson courtesy
Church of Sweden)

“We are on track to get an agreement on the package in the coming weeks. If we can achieve this, we will be in a much stronger position to press for an ambitious agreement in Copenhagen next year,” Wallstrom said.

But back in 2007, “no one foresaw the economic crisis that was about to engulf the world,” the vice president said. “Faced with the present financial turmoil and economic recession, some EU governments – especially in Eastern Europe – have become unwilling to accept targets which they perceive as imposing further economic constraints on their industries. They question whether we can afford to take these drastic steps.”

“My answer – to quote Barack Obama – is ‘Yes we can!’ In fact, we can’t afford not to!” Wallstrom said.

She cited the 2006 report by UK economist Sir Nicholas Stern on the economics of climate change, which estimates that allowing climate change to continue unchecked would shrink the world’s economic output by at least five percent and possibly as much as 20 percent per year if the most dramatic predictions come to pass.

“This dreadful prospect is exactly what a struggling global economy does NOT need,” Wallstrom said. “By contrast, swift action to tackle climate change and to move to a low-carbon economy would cost only one percent of the world’s Gross Domestic Product.”

Hope for a climate agreement was strengthened when in Bali last December, the United States at last came on board. “This was a major breakthrough after years of resistance from the Bush administration,” Wallstrom said, adding that President-elect Barack Obama “clearly has ambitions to combat climate change.”

The Uppsala Manifesto calls for political leaders to reach an agreement during the preparations of the new global Climate Protocol 2009 on a strategy that is “sufficiently responsible and ambitious for the Earth to be saved for future generations.”

But there are dissenting voices. Rajan Zed, a Hindu chaplain in northwestern Nevada and adjoining California, who delivered the historic first Hindu opening prayer in United States Senate in Washington, said today that the “grandiose” Interfaith Climate Manifesto signed at Uppsala lacks moral strength because of Hindus and other religions were not represented.

Other world religions, like Bahaism, Jainism, Shintoism, Confucianism, Zoroastrianism, and the Greek Orthodox Church also were not represented.

Zed, who is president of Universal Society of Hinduism, said that it was commendable to see diverse religious leaders, religions and denominations coming together to bless environmental causes in Uppsala, but the organizers should have given adequate and fair representation to all major world religions.

Zed said he admires the Church of Sweden and Archbishop Wejryd for taking the leadership role in organizing this “much-needed” summit and thus “making religions climate friendly.”

The Uppsala Manifesto will create a new framework for discussion about climate change after the Kyoto agreement expires in 2012 said one of the signers, Professor Hava Tirosh-Samuelson, director of the Jewish Studies program at Arizona State University.

“Today it is widely acknowledged that world religions have an important role to play in revisioning a sustainable future, because religions are the repositories of values and norms that guide human actions toward the natural world,” said Tirosh-Samuelson. “Through cosmological narratives, symbols, rituals, ethical directives, and institutional structures, religions shape how we act toward the environment.”

“Hence,” she said, “all attempts to transform our environmental attitudes so as to generate a sustainable world must include understanding of world religions and cooperation with religious people.”

View This Story On Eco–mmunity Map.