<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sundance Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/tag/bas-jan-ader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered</link>
	<description>Fresh culture daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:20:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Not much to look at: conceptual art at the MoMA</title>
		<link>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2009/08/not-much-to-look-at-conceptual-art-at-the-moma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2009/08/not-much-to-look-at-conceptual-art-at-the-moma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Perrin Drumm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen Ruppersberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bas Jan Ader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conceptual art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ger Van Elk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilbert and George]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/?p=23651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23653" src="http://media.sundancechannel.com/UPLOADS/blog/wordpress/images/2009/08/gilbert-and-george.png" alt="gilbert-and-george" width="448" height="366" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Gilbert and George</em></p>

Conceptual art can be funny, poignant and clever, but overall, with a few exceptions, I find it to be one of the most visually underwhelming schools of art. I suppose that's bound to happen when the artist lays out the framework or provides only the idea (the <em>concept</em>) and leaves the rest of the work - in some cases the entire visual element of a piece - to the viewer. It's curious then that the artist I like best out of the bunch is Lawrence Weiner. It has a lot to do with our mutual love of the letterform, but I also genuinely enjoy thinking (<em>conceptualizing</em>) about the concrete thing his words describe.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sundancechannel.com/sunfiltered/2009/08/not-much-to-look-at-conceptual-art-at-the-moma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

