Dearest Donna,
I purposely truncated the message I left for you about a day after I posted it because I felt my response was too long and strayed away from the subject of this documentary. By doing so, I wound up leaving what I now see one might construe as a mixed message.
My caregiver types all my correspondence for me, because, as I said, I lack the power to use my arms and hands. Therefore, it is rare that I post anything on the internet anymore.
When I said ‘want for better days,’ I ought to have specified that I was addressing the ghastly state of our healthcare programs as well as the financial mess in which we find ourselves in America.
On a more personal level, it has been nearly fifteen years since an unknown assailant murdered my mom, which I mentioned in my first post. She was a loving grandmother with not a single enemy in the world. It is an unimaginable loss for those of us who lose a loved one in such a manner. Cold-blooded murder makes no sense to me.
Detectives have not been able to solve her murder and my ‘want for better days,’ is to know who killed my mom, why they killed her, and see justice done.
As for me, my ‘want for better days’ is that I do not know if I will live to see the day detectives catch and charge her killer. Since her murder remains unsolved, I fight minute by minute for every breath of life I can get. As a side note to that statement, I have found when one is fighting for every moment of life; there always exists a lack of irate behavior because life is too important. My experience is that most disabled or terminally ill people have no time for anger.
Nonetheless, in talking to others who have lost loved ones to violent crime there simply is no forgetting such an indescribable tragedy.
I am resigned to knowing I can only wait for detectives to tell me they have solved the case. Because I am so ill, what they do or do not do is beyond my control.
Like Christopher and Dana Reeve, as well as Tomas Young, my ‘want for better days,’ is to live to see stem cell studies yielding relief, or cures. Then I could go back into the entertainment industry here in California – I miss my work.
At last read, Dr. Hawking does not give any thought to his disease according to an article on his website.
Although ALS and other disabilities may not be a topic Dr. Hawking thinks about much, I felt this was not the place to publish my work as an advocate. I support and promote organizations such as family and friends of murder victims, ADA, ALS, other disabled people, the national campaign for tolerance and others.
Many disabled people have said they refuse to join any messageboard because able-bodied people cite Christopher Reeve as a hero to emulate too often. They have told me such a remark immediately shames them and portrays their life experience invalid. This is the central reason for online communities, podcasts, and so forth, for people like me. We value them because there is no judgment or baiting. I listen to a podcast from England and occasionally post comments on their site because I am English born and I guess I am just a little proud of my Celtic ancestry. I have family who live in England and Ireland. There are many online disability communities here in America that broadcast podcasts as well. I listen to them to find out what is happening in the disabled community here.
It remains for me to mention, after hearing and reading Mr. Reeve, I doubt he would want anyone to invoke his name simply for inspirations sake. Although he looked to the future, he was also aware how fragile life is. Though I ware the Superman dog tags Mr. Reeve’s wife, Dana, created after his death, who among us would have thought at the time the foundation would lose such a strong, fearless, talented, funny, and beautiful woman.
Because of my work with ALSA, I received a letter on September 23, 2008. It states the Department of Veterans Affairs published groundbreaking new laws that grant military veterans diagnosed with Lou Gehrig’s Disease full access to health and disability benefits, regardless of where or when they served in the military. The new rules took effect that day. ALS has taken too many of our heroes and it continues to strike veterans at twice the rate as the general public.
While we have made important progress in expanding benefits for veterans and advancing the search for a treatment, we must do more. We need to learn why our troops are at greater risk and take action to protect them. We need to ensure that veterans receive the care and benefits they deserve and have earned. And we need to find a treatment.
Every 90 minutes a doctor in the United States diagnosis someone with ALS, and every 90 minutes, someone in the United States dies because of ALS.
But it is a double-edged sword because if a veteran is in a hospice care program, the new VA benefits are useless. The disabled and ill veteran must choose between the two programs that do not deliver total care. For instance, I waited five years for a headrest for my wheelchair through VA, and my wheelchair did not have a cushion the day I got it. Now that I am in hospice care, the state puts limits on what durable medical equipment I can have, and I cannot leave my home unless it is to see a dentist. Thus, I have learned there is no perfect program that will be suitable for disabled veterans or the veteran on the street. The model depends on how far advanced a veteran patients disability is.
As stated, I am in a 'In Home Hospice Care' program. I am one of those people that do not seek a handout all I ask for is a hand up when I need it. Otherwise, I fight each day alone and live the best of life left me as best I can. No one can ask for more than that from me - except Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
As I require an in-home caregiver, I find myself fighting the state, the county, and the federal government every year, but especially now because of the financial problems in California. Yet, because I am not allowed to leave my home, my caregiver must act for me when government agencies try to remove me from programs I need to continue living. It is important for all of us to remember what veterans are coming home to, because they just might need help that individual families cannot afford to provide. We cannot allow any more veterans to wind-up living under freeways all across this country.
This past Veterans Day disabled veterans and the workers who provide their home care rallied to demand Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and lawmakers protect efficient programs that provide proven results to taxpayers - like the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program here in California.
My ‘want for better days’ is when the state understands that terminal illness means terminal illness.
My ‘want for better days’ is when discrimination no longer exists. No veteran should be turned away because he or she does not have private insurance.
‘“IHSS provides home care for more than 429,000 low-income people with disabilities, the elderly, disabled veterans, and blind, while saving taxpayers millions of dollars by eliminating the need for costly long-term care institutions.
"I'm a veteran and, yes, I'm disabled. I'm able to live independently at home because of home care, but enough is enough. I'm tired of hearing our state leaders say 'every program budget cut is on the table.' Why is an efficient program that I rely upon still on the table when it's been proven repeatedly to be among the most cost-effective in the country?" said Herb Meyer, a Korean War veteran, senior, and IHSS consumer from Marin County. "The public wants a fair and balanced budget, and that means protecting programs that give taxpayers the most bang for their buck."
The Legislative Analyst's Office has estimated that annual spending on each IHSS recipient is $9,924. But if that IHSS consumer is forced into nursing homes (also known as, sniffs), the state pays about $55,000 a year, and the quality of care is appalling. The IHSS program is a cost-effective part of California's long-term care system, enabling thousands of Californians - including disabled veterans, seniors, and other persons with disabilities - to stay out of nursing homes and other institutions.
"Legislators have repeatedly told Governor Schwarzenegger that IHSS is among the cost-effective and efficient state programs," said Karen Sandidge, an IHSS provider in Sacramento County and member of SEIU-UHW. "They have rejected his cuts in the past and we hope the Governor takes a closer look at this program so he can see it is working well and delivering value to taxpayers."
"It is still crystal clear that our budget system is broken," said Bill Young, a Korean War veteran, senior, and IHSS consumer from Sacramento County. "How else do you explain the Governor proposing cuts to a cost-effective program? All we hear from the Governor is that we need to sacrifice and tighten our belts. Well, Governor Schwarzenegger, you've already put the belt around my neck. How much more do you want to tighten it?"
"This isn't belt-tightening and sacrifice; it's a tourniquet, a desperate measure by a Governor who has squandered the political will and fiscal sense that could have fixed the state's unstable budget system," said Marty Omoto, Director and Organizer of CA Disability Community Action (CDCAN).
IHSS is a statewide public program providing essential personal care and domestic services to approximately 429,000 disabled veterans, the aged, blind or other disabled Californians who are unable to remain safely in their own homes without such assistance.
"This is a program where the Federal government matches the state's commitment and we're walking away from millions of dollars in funding," said John Wilkins, an IHSS consumer in Fresno County and Co-Chair of the Quality Homecare Coalition. "Local and regional governments are left holding the bag. This is exactly the type of short-sighted budget process that put California in this fiscal crisis to begin with. I hope the Governor recognizes he has proven himself a reckless and irresponsible fiscal manager - even worse than former governors he mocked before running for the office in 2003."
"While we recognize the dire fiscal situation of the California state budget, it is inexcusable for the Governor to sacrifice the health and welfare of disabled veterans, seniors, and other people with disabilities and their caregivers with these devastating budget cut proposals," said home care provider Ed Huddleston of Merced, a veteran and a member of the United Domestic Workers of America.
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has yet again proposed drastic cuts ($348.9 million this year and over $1 billion next year) to cash assistance for low-income elderly, disabled veterans, blind or other disabled consumers who depend on two vital programs: Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and State Supplementary Program (SSP).
The Governor also plans to slash the fixed incomes of approximately 1.3 million Californians who are disabled veterans, elderly, blind, or have other disabilities - people who depend on SSI/SSP grants to survive. The current SSI/SSP grant is only $870 for an individual and $1,524 for a couple. People who depend on SSI are supposed to pay for all their needs - food, shelter, utilities, and transportation - out of this amount. The Governor has proposed cutting SSI/SSP grants to $830 for an individual and $1,407 for a couple.”’
I need not say, on such an income I am without a wheelchair van to go to dental appointments, and therefore must spend a small fortune to rent a wheelchair van for a few hours. What am I saying; I must pay for an entire day for a forty-five minute appointment with my dentist.
‘”Taking that money away from poor Californians won't have a great effect on California's budget but it will have a grim effect on the people who rely on it to survive," said Frances Gracechild, Executive Director of Resources for Independent Living Centers and Co-Chair of the Quality Homecare Coalition. "Approximately 78 percent of In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) consumers receive SSI/SSP. California's SSI/SSP recipients are not eligible for food stamps - therefore, the loss of the federal SSI COLA will not be balanced with food stamp benefits as is done in many other states."
The Legislative Analyst's Office analysis has suggested in the past that the Governor's funding freeze would jeopardize the IHSS program by making it difficult to retain quality home care workers. In addition to rolling back work pay to minimum wage, a number of care providers would lose their health insurance due to inadequate funding. And many will lose their homes because of Schwarzenegger's funding freeze.
"It is difficult to believe that the Governor should have such a complete lack of understanding about how difficult it will be for IHSS workers as a result of frozen wages and lack of healthcare benefits," said Jerry Williams, a Sutter County IHSS provider, member of SEIU 4034/AFSCME and twenty-year veteran of the National Guard. "If he could live for just one week in our shoes, he would see things differently and revise his proposals."
"We have lobbied the Governor continuously about his cuts and funding freezes, and he continues to ignore our pleas," said Bill Powers of the California Alliance for Retired Americans.”’
And so it goes….
Donna, I sincerely hope this is taken in the spirit in which it is intended… to fill in the gaps that apparently made my post vague. I am sorry I truncated this out of my post.
Because I cannot type without my caregiver, and because I cannot leave my e-mail address on an open blog, I will let you decide if you want to leave your e-mail address.
Good luck to you in your future philanthropic endeavors!
Be well to you and yours.
My best regards,
Sean |