Oh Please. If by "fundamentalist", you mean someone who takes the Bible as absolute truth, then yes I am. But I would be welcome in many fundamentalist churches about as much as a black, gay cowboy is welcome at a KKK rally. I married a black woman, and I have a biracial daughter. I have a few piercings and used to wear a mohawk, until my hair started thinning, and I had to start shaving my head. So I would hardly fit in at Bob Jones University.
You can feel however you wish. There are many things that I feel, or would like to be ok. But its not up to my feelings. Truth is based on Biblical scripture. I do not buy for a minute that people are born gay. There are thousands of psychologists and scientists that would agree and say that the so-called evidence for being born gay doesnt exist.
As to the scripture that we dont adhere to today? Again, context. In the Old Testament, there were different types of law. There was the Mosaic Covenant, which includes the 10 commandments, there was civil law, which applied specifically to the tribes of Israel, and there was one other type of law, which I cannot remember right now. But it all depends on context. Jesus himself did not mention SPECIFICALLY homosexuality, but there were many other issues that he did not mention specifically either, but that 99% of Christians wouldnt question.
I have never downed Jay. I have asked why he took the stand he has on certain issues, and said that to me, it seems contradictory to scripture. You are the one who has been on the attack dude. I have made no personal attacks on anyone, yet you seem to always be up in arms and attacking all those crazy fundamentalists, as you call them.
I did say that I agreed totally with what Mark said in another post. I agree with him completely. You of course attacked him as well. But Mark made a great point to which you had no response. If the Bible is not the decider of issues for Christians, then what is? The way you feel? The way I feel? Whether I feel that homosexuality is wrong or not doesnt matter. What matters is, what would Jesus do? What did he teach? What does the Bible say on the matter? I will say to you like I said to Mark. If the Bible is wrong in one area, or up for debate, then how do I know that the Resurrection is true? Why should I believe in any of it? Personally, if the Bible is wrong in any area, then I will never darken the door of a church again, and I would become a complete and total hedonist. You guys keep arguing issues based on how you feel about them. I am going to stick with what the Bible says about it.
jcisthelight619 wrote:
(Jan 22 2007 @ 08:16pm)
Well, that explains a lot. Look, you're fundamentalist...I am not in any way. I do believe there are consequences for sin..including perverted sexual acts..lustful acts...BOTH heterosexual and homosexual..that is what I feel the bible means...not love...so we can go around and around. People are born gay...that is what I believe..you cannot change my mind on it - and I have said...what about all the other scripture that we do not adhere to today? Yourlast comment...women didn't have very many rights back then-things have changed...so many churches don't allow women ministers - yet some do - is it a sin? No, because we have evolved - The fundamentalist is just as clever in blowing up what they want and looking over laws stated in the bible. Seems that you do pretty good in coming on here...downing Jay and then say, "what did I do?"...like I said before..that the typical fundamentalist way....spout off and then say, "now wait a minute, you're being awfully agressive and that is just not the way of the Lord"....I grew up Southern Baptist...I am very familiar with how it all works. So, say what you will how I am starting a fight..there sure isn't any love coming from you brother.
seniorsun wrote:
(Jan 22 2007 @ 08:03pm)
Boy, you love to look for something to pick a fight over, ont you? Once again, you took what I said out of context.
So what do you do with all the verses in the Bible that relate to sin and its consequences? Is there EVER a time when you think that people should judge others' behaviour? What about the instructions in the New Testament on how the church should deal with open sin? If you read those passages, its quite clear that the early church was told that open, unrepentent sin SHOULD be judged and handled in the right way.
As far as women ministers go, really not sure because I havent read up on it much. Would prefer a male preacher, but thats just my preference.
jcisthelight619 wrote:
(Jan 22 2007 @ 07:37pm)
Oh, with reply to your:
"And Jesus NEVER said that we should completely accept others. He NEVER said that."
Also,Jesus NEVER mentioned condemnation of homosexuality...NEVER said it.
I think Jesus would be quite ashamed of how the fundamentalist have twisted his love and message...and as the Revolution sticker states...have been a bunch of judgmental bastards. I applaud Jay and others who are truly touching lives instead of kicking their feet up on the judgement table as THEY decide what is good and just...how about women ministers? Thoughts?
[quote=jcisthelight619] (Jan 22 2007 @ 07:09pm)
That's absurd..truly absurd. I can see a HUGE difference..because I too know people who are athiest and agnostic. Here we go again...you are a fundamentalist that sits back, believing what you will and making shrude judgements - you believe that homosexuals are prostitutes or drunks...you clump them all into the same mound of sin...because the bible tells you so..again, a bible that clumped the word homosexual only 50 years ago. And so called book you mentioned in one of your earlier posts? By good ol' Josh? Might want to read how his work is under fire...and how he is not very good at explaining what exactly he DOES believe. Many other Christians have criticized his work. Oh, and I guess when you hold church and try to save others in a bar...it's not as good as your polished pews and shiney pulpit...the message just doesn't seem as valuable when a good ol' boy preacher in a fancy suit delivers the message...I mean, there sure isn't any mockery going on there...they are a polished as a new penny...and I would imaging would make it to heaven a whole lot quicker, don't you think?
[quote=seniorsun] (Jan 22 2007 @ 06:42pm)
You are quite right, but Jesus also talked much about sin and its penalty. He also drove people out of the temple with a whip because of their mockery of the holiness of the place. And Jesus NEVER said that we should completely accept others. He NEVER said that. He said that we should love them, but dont try to tell me that he said we should accept everything about people. That is so untrue. He said to turn away from our sin, to repent and go and sin no more. Though I really like the show, Jay seems to have forgotten that. Jesus went to the saloons and he talked with the prostitutes and showed them love. But he didnt sit there and take her services, trying to prove that he loved her. He didnt drink up the liquor in the saloons. He says over and over and over that there should be a difference in the lives of Christians. I dont see much of a difference in Jays actions and the actions of many agnostics and atheists that I know. So where is the difference?
[quote=corykaren] (Jan 18 2007 @ 02:19am)
I think you missed it but it not surprising, most Christians do, his ministry is about love and grace, the complete acceptance of others much like the example of Christ. Jay is one cool cat and I know the God I love is Proud of him.
[[quote=dmaycock] (Jan 10 2007 @ 04:04pm)
I recently found the show today, and after watching it I think it shows the struggle Jay is having with lots of things. Yet the whole show just amounts to gay theology - is jay nothing more than that? Two out of six episodes, now stemming into a third - great, he has a stance - but why must the ENTIRE SHOW be about that.
If Jay wants to be known as pro-gay preaching, why not change the name of the church, write a book and go on the road with that - I don't think it is though
The verse goes "Love others, as you would want to be loved". I myself would want someone to make sure I'm walking that narrow path he mentioned in episode three - accountability is important, it's what loving someone is about. I think we all have sin, but saying something is ok and declaring it's not a sin is a stance - regardless, Jay is a brother in Christ and I'd give him a hug if I saw him cuz that's what I'd want him to do to me, even though I think yes, it is a sin.
Why does the ENTIRE SHOW need to be focused on that though.
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote] |