The original thesis is correct.. but that is not the entire story. No, you don't have to be OF the same background/culture to do good work. But you DO have to go into the process of the programming and analysis UNDERSTANDING that the culture of the community always matters. (Assuming you don't need to understand the local community is a failure too many white Americans keep making decade after decade. Just look at the mess created by cultural misunderstanding on a global level that we Americans find ourselves in the last 8+ years.)
I think the original poster of this thread implies (correctly) that the students probably were not working with that understanding initially-- at least it doesn't appear as if they did.
But as an African American licensed architect, I applaud the work all volunteers (with good intentions, not selfish intentions) are making in the NOLA, MISS, Gulf coast areas-- including these hard working students on this program.
Context does matter. But that doesn't mean we, as designers/planners should be foolish devotees to styles AND approaches OF THE PAST. So indeed, move FORWARD with better expectations for our communities, better approaches, better technology and methods. Mindless regurgitating of styles of the past is not the solution to successful rebuilding of damaged communities. And as planners and architects (and students) it's OUR responsibility to convey to communities/clients just why what you are proposing will suit and SERVE the users/community GOING FORWARD -- not just looking to the past. You can address the history and context (and comfort) of the past, but you should design for the future well being of that user, home owner, for that community, so that those structures don't become obsolete by the time they first walk through the door.
History does matter, but so too does planning FOR A COMMUNITY's FUTURE. And you must convey that to the people you serve. Because that communication with the people you serve is ALSO part of your job as planner and architect-- not just providing the design & technical expertise.
Also, contrary to what the world of TV, movies and media might tell outsiders (to the profession), novices and students of architecture/planning, the Architecture profession CAN be an incredibly thankless job. It's often not at all glamorous. If you go into arch/ design thinking people will adore you, admire you, or worse--- because you are SEEKING admiration, approval and recognition, then get another line of work (and get into therapy).
In my opinion, you do the work because you feel it serves people well, because you want to contribute to communities, because you want to do the right thing that HELPS people (and makes them safe/r). If you go into architecture for more superficial reasons, then you are bound to become disillusioned. So, either get over it and get to work, or find a new line of work. People may NEVER thank you for your good work/visionary thinking (while you're alive) -- just ask Buckminster Fuller.
Cutting edge thinkers, visionaries and yes, sometimes architects have throughout HISTORY been ridiculed, lambasted for their innovative work/thinking long before the masses and local politicians came around to understanding the solutions. Rebuilding the damaged Gulf area (or even tornado damaged towns like Greensburg, Kansas) is no different.
Stick to what you believe in but be prepared to adjust your approach so as to address the needs of your clientele. Listen to your clients'/community's needs, and devise solutions which HELP them live fulfilling, safe, happy lives not as lived in the past, but toward a promising future.
-Signed Chicago Architect
I welcome dialog (not ranting) about ideas and solutions.
Whiners need not reply.
|