Well, in my experience, the majority of developers that come into minority neighborhoods to develop homes (the last 50 years) are pimps and liars and woefully unqualified to be doing the work [at all]. They're there because of the money (to be made)-- not because they (as developers) care about the people or businesses in that community. That is not, however, an indictment of this particular project. I don't know enough about the parties connected with this particular project to affirm or pronounce their effectiveness.
But that bias aside, it seems the students (and faculty and developer) here got off on the wrong foot because they (seemingly) didn't go out of their way to work with the community and to explain AND EDUCATE (the community) why what they were proposing (and eventually building) was good for the community's future.
On the other hand, Americans are slow to move away from their traditional (Victorian) tastes. Change (of any kind) frightens a lot of people-- regardless of background and economic status. But as I stated in my post on these boards re: Race, http://www.sundancechannel.com/discussions/Post/390367394, CONTEXT DOES MATTER.
If you're going to propose something that is very different from the existing context, you need to be able to articulate why you think it will be advantageous (for the user and/or community) going forward. Merely saying it looks cooler, or it's different, or it's what they are doing in X town isn't an answer.
But that doesn't mean we, as designers/planners should be foolish devotees to styles AND approaches OF THE PAST. (I really like the designs the students have come up with. As an architect, I think they're terrific.) But you have to make the case to the community why you are suggesting moving past a literal replication of the past. Why modern and not shotgun (as the residents know it)?
So indeed, move FORWARD with better expectations for our communities, better approaches, better technology and methods. Mindless regurgitating of styles of the past is not the solution to successful rebuilding of damaged communities.
As planners and architects (and students) it's OUR responsibility to convey to communities/clients just why what you are proposing will suit and SERVE the users/community GOING FORWARD -- not just looking to the past. You can address the history and context (and comfort) of the past, but you should design for the future well being of that user, home owner, for that community, so that those structures don't become obsolete by the time they first walk through the door.
Explain the benefits to the USERS/Community the WHY and WHAT of what you are doing. By NOT communicating with the COMMUNITY ON A CONSISTENT basis, you are setting yourself up for mistrust w/ the people you claim to be serving. If your motivation is to (first) serve yourself (for some other motivation-- like awards, money and notoriety), it will be apparent to your "clients".
Remind New Orleans residents that, at one time, the art form of JAZZ was looked upon as something weird, non-conforming, out of context (with traditional and classical music). Often, "modern" architecture is viewed the way Jazz was viewed when it first started to be heard. The designers (and developers) have to make the case for what they are proposing. If you lie about it (and your true motivations), people will see right through you (and you would then deserve to fail.)
It also would have been helpful if the people involved in the project weren't mostly white (-- at least as portrayed in the TV series). Latino, Black and Asian architectural students, consultants AND PROFESSORS do exist in the world. Maybe Tulane needs to re-assess if they need to do more outreach for design students (and staff) from different backgrounds and cultures. As well-intentioned as the Students & Faculty/Advisors were, they are naive (or arrogant) if they think that their (albeit unintended) cultural biases don't influence how they approach and interact with the NOLA community.
OBVIOUSLY --whether the Student & Faculty members acknowledge or admit it-- their attitudes rubbed the local community the wrong way. (And they need to ask themselves why that is.) Blaming the NOLA residents for not understanding you and your designs is not the entire truth nor the correct answer. And that is something the Faculty/Advisors and students SHOULD AND COULD have been better prepared to deal with.
- Signed
African American Licensed Architect in Chicago
|